This reminds me of your point the other day about -ism. The union of the sets of asexual strict vs antisexual soft. As in someone one who is willing but not completely so. Many are antisexual soft vs one gender or the other.
But can you include gender into that equation in this context?
asexual simply meaning no active desire can be dichotomized with someone who has sexual avoidance or atisexual as it were in that they will probably accept a well trained ( professionally or casually ) sexual partner who performs specifically pleasurable action and techniques. Whereas an antisexual person would specifically avoid *all* physical contact most likely.
The sickening question is to what extent the difference between asexual and antisexual is not natural but driven from trauma. I am personally pro the asexual term. I can get long with someone who is asexual. I know right where that line goes. Strait to facebook..mostly.. and never to a good morning, unless its on a flip honey moon..that is. Vegas casino room?
Fine I will use LiveJournal, heh ~ Shea
But can you include gender into that equation in this context?
asexual simply meaning no active desire can be dichotomized with someone who has sexual avoidance or atisexual as it were in that they will probably accept a well trained ( professionally or casually ) sexual partner who performs specifically pleasurable action and techniques. Whereas an antisexual person would specifically avoid *all* physical contact most likely.
The sickening question is to what extent the difference between asexual and antisexual is not natural but driven from trauma. I am personally pro the asexual term. I can get long with someone who is asexual. I know right where that line goes. Strait to facebook..mostly.. and never to a good morning, unless its on a flip honey moon..that is. Vegas casino room?